SymphonyAI SensaAI for Sanctions Pricing - up to 30% off list
Updated: 1 day ago
The first thing worth knowing about SymphonyAI SensaAI for Sanctions Pricing is what the number will not cover. It does not include your sanctions, PEP and adverse-media list subscriptions, which are licensed from the data vendors. It does not include the NetReveal screening engine the module runs on, which is a separate agreement. It does not include tuning, integration or the payment-rail testing that follows. What it covers is the AI layer that decides which of your screening hits deserve a human, and SymphonyAI publishes no price for it at all. Stackingo, an authorised SymphonyAI reseller, quotes it at up to 30% below list across the GCC, UK & Ireland, Europe, Oceania and the US.
How is SymphonyAI SensaAI for Sanctions Pricing structured?
It is structured as a single negotiated line inside a wider screening agreement, which is why the table below has one row rather than a ladder of editions. SymphonyAI operates no pricing page; symphonyai.com/pricing returns a 404. The Azure Marketplace listing for the module carries one plan whose starting price is zero over a three-year term with a pricing type of free — Microsoft's mechanism for attaching a privately negotiated offer, not a rate anybody pays. The sibling NetReveal Transaction Screening listing behaves the same way over a five-year term. There is no AWS Marketplace entry, no Google Cloud entry and no UK G-Cloud service, and the review sites carry no figure either.
Plan | List (per month) | Stackingo | What the line actually covers |
SensaAI for Sanctions — the single Marketplace plan | On request | Up to 30% below list | The AI screening layer only. Scoped against screening throughput, the payment rails and customer populations in scope, and the NetReveal Name or Transaction Screening engine it augments. Watchlist data, the engine licence and implementation are quoted separately. |
One row is an accurate picture rather than a thin one. A sanctions screening estate has four cost centres — the engine, the data, the AI layer and the people who tune it — and this module is one of them. Buyers who ask for a single all-in figure usually get one, and it is usually the most expensive way to buy, because a blended number hides which component is growing at renewal. Ask for the four to be quoted separately and priced separately, then apply the discount to each. Stackingo's position holds on the SymphonyAI lines regardless of how the rest is arranged.
Which SymphonyAI SensaAI for Sanctions plans are available?
A plan, in this context, is not an edition with a feature list. It is a scope statement: which screening flows the AI layer is entitled to run against, at what throughput, for how long. SymphonyAI exposes exactly one plan on the Azure Marketplace and no tiering behind it, so the SymphonyAI SensaAI for Sanctions plans a buyer actually chooses between are configurations of that single entitlement rather than products off a shelf. The variables that move the figure are throughput, the number of screening flows and the term.
Customer screening only — On request. The AI layer applied to onboarding and periodic customer rescreening, leaving payment traffic on the existing rules. The narrowest starting scope and the easiest to evidence, because rescreening runs are discrete and the before-and-after hit counts are simple to compare.
Payment screening only — On request. Applied to real-time payment message traffic, where the operational pain is worst and the latency budget is tightest. Demand a written latency commitment in this configuration; an AI layer that adds milliseconds to a payment rail is a production problem, not a compliance one.
Both flows, one agreement — On request. Customer and payment screening covered together and co-terminated with the underlying engine. Usually the better commercial outcome if you intend to reach full coverage anyway, because throughput is aggregated rather than priced twice.
Evaluation period, then production — On request. A time-boxed run against recorded screening history before the production term starts. Insist that the success measure is agreed in writing beforehand, expressed as false positives removed at a fixed true-positive recall.
None of the four has ever carried a published figure, and the marketplace listing does not change that. Each carries the same Stackingo position instead: up to 30% below SymphonyAI list, with a contractual floor of 10%, applied to the module and to the screening engine it depends on. The choice between them is about coverage and evidence, not about price bands.
How are SymphonyAI SensaAI for Sanctions licenses assigned and reassigned?
Take a bank screening 1.2 million payment messages a month against a watchlist that changes several times a week. Its hit rate is 2%, so 24,000 alerts reach the queue, and 99% of those are discounted as false matches. Nothing in that arithmetic is a headcount. That is the point: SymphonyAI SensaAI for Sanctions licenses are entitlements against screening volume and screening flows, not seats issued to compliance analysts. If the bank doubles its analyst team the licence figure does not move; if it acquires a book and adds 400,000 messages a month, it does.
Reassignment follows the same logic and is therefore a contractual act rather than an administrative one. Moving the entitlement to a different legal entity, a new payment rail or an acquired portfolio is a variation to the scope schedule, and it is the moment a vendor is most tempted to reprice from current list. Two clauses prevent that: expansions priced from your held rate rather than fresh list, and a stated uplift cap at renewal. Stackingo writes both into the agreement and handles the variation inside it, so growth does not quietly reset the discount you negotiated at the start.
What is a SymphonyAI SensaAI for Sanctions subscription and how does it work?
Work an example through the term. Suppose SymphonyAI quotes an annual figure of Q for a three-year commitment covering both screening flows. At the contractual floor of 10% you pay 0.90Q a year, or 2.70Q across the term. At the ceiling of 30% you pay 0.70Q a year, or 2.10Q. The difference is 0.60Q — more than half a year's subscription recovered without touching scope, coverage or the recall threshold your regulator cares about. That is the whole commercial case, and it is available before anybody has quoted a number.
Mechanically, a SymphonyAI SensaAI for Sanctions subscription is billed annually in advance against a multi-year term and co-terminated with the screening engine beneath it. The Azure listing's three-year term unit is a fair indication of the length SymphonyAI structures around, and the five-year unit on the related NetReveal Transaction Screening offer shows how far that can stretch. Longer terms buy a better rate and cost you flexibility; that trade is negotiable, and it should be negotiated alongside the uplift cap rather than after it.
What should a SymphonyAI SensaAI for Sanctions reseller do for you?
Rivals in sanctions screening are noticeably more forthcoming about their commercial models. Several publish per-message or per-screened-name bands, some list on public cloud marketplaces at real rates, and a few appear on the UK G-Cloud framework with rate cards anybody can download. SymphonyAI does none of this: no pricing page, no priced marketplace listing, no framework entry, and no figure on TrustRadius or PeerSpot. That asymmetry is the practical reason to use an intermediary. A SymphonyAI SensaAI for Sanctions reseller sees quotations for comparable institutions and can say whether yours is ordinary before you countersign it.
Beyond benchmarking, the useful reseller work on this product is specification. Sanctions screening quotes go wrong in predictable places: throughput measured at average rather than peak, list-refresh frequency left unstated, model explainability promised verbally and absent from the schedule, and the false-positive reduction expressed as a marketing percentage rather than a tested figure on your own data. Fixing those before the vendor prices is worth more than arguing about the total afterwards. Stackingo drafts that specification with you, then applies its discount of up to 30%, floored at 10%, to the result.
The practical route to buy SymphonyAI SensaAI for Sanctions
The sequence is short and rarely varies. You confirm which screening engine you run and whether it is SymphonyAI's own. You measure peak and average screening throughput on each flow, and pull twelve months of hit and disposition history. You decide the recall threshold you will not go below, because that is the number your regulator will ask about. You agree a written evaluation against that history. Only then does anybody produce a figure, and the figure reflects the scope you defined rather than the scope a salesperson assumed.
From there, to buy SymphonyAI SensaAI for Sanctions through Stackingo takes three further steps: the opportunity is registered with SymphonyAI before the quotation is raised, the discount position is applied at quote stage rather than argued afterwards, and you receive one document setting SymphonyAI list, the Stackingo figure and the saving side by side. The licences are genuine, the tenant and support path are unchanged, and the renewal date is tracked from the day the agreement is signed rather than discovered ninety days out.
How a SymphonyAI partner protects your discount
By writing the floor into the contract. That is the short answer, and it matters more here than in most software categories, because sanctions screening is close to impossible to switch mid-term. Once the models are tuned to your population and your regulator has seen the testing evidence, the vendor's negotiating position improves at every renewal. A SymphonyAI partner discount that exists only as goodwill erodes in exactly that situation. One with a contractual minimum of 10% and a stated ceiling of 30% does not, because the number survives the change of account manager and the quarter-end that has nothing to do with you.
The second protection is procedural rather than commercial. The partner registers the opportunity before the vendor quotes, so the discount is inside the first number you see rather than a concession extracted from it. Mid-term expansions are priced from the rate you already hold. Renewal uplift is capped in the same schedule. None of this is exotic, and all of it is easier to obtain at signature than at any point afterwards, which is why it belongs in the first conversation rather than the last.
Working with an authorised SymphonyAI SensaAI for Sanctions distributor
A distributor, in this context, is the party that holds the vendor relationship, the regional contracting entities and the licensing paperwork so that you do not have to hold any of them. An authorised SymphonyAI SensaAI for Sanctions distributor contracts in the jurisdiction where your obligation sits, invoices in the currency your finance team budgets in, and carries a single renewal calendar across every entity in the group. For an institution whose sanctions obligations differ between its Gulf, European and US operations, that consolidation removes real work.
Stackingo performs that role across the GCC, UK & Ireland, Europe, Oceania and the US, with AED, SAR, QAR, GBP, EUR, SEK, AUD, NZD and USD available at the point of invoice. The commercial position does not change with the currency: up to 30% below SymphonyAI list, never less than 10%, on genuine SymphonyAI licences with the same entitlements and the same support path you would receive buying direct. What changes is that someone else is tracking the scope, the caps and the dates.
How much does SymphonyAI SensaAI for Sanctions cost by country and currency?
Sanctions screening is the one compliance function where the contracting jurisdiction is a substantive question rather than an administrative one, because the obligations differ by regime and the paper often has to sit with the entity that carries them. The table sets out where Stackingo contracts, invoices and supports the licence, and confirms the discount position is identical in each. Prices remain on request everywhere, because SymphonyAI publishes none anywhere. Exchange rates are fixed at signature rather than floating across the term.
Market | Currency | List (per month) | Stackingo (per month) |
Australia | AUD | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Austria | EUR | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Bahrain | BHD | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Belgium | EUR | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Bulgaria | EUR | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Croatia | EUR | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Cyprus | EUR | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Czechia | CZK | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Denmark | DKK | On request | Up to 30% below list |
England | GBP | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Estonia | EUR | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Finland | EUR | On request | Up to 30% below list |
France | EUR | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Germany | EUR | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Greece | EUR | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Hungary | HUF | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Ireland | EUR | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Italy | EUR | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Kuwait | KWD | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Latvia | EUR | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Lithuania | EUR | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Luxembourg | EUR | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Malta | EUR | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Netherlands | EUR | On request | Up to 30% below list |
New Zealand | NZD | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Northern Ireland | GBP | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Oman | OMR | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Poland | PLN | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Portugal | EUR | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Qatar | QAR | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Romania | RON | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Saudi Arabia | SAR | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Scotland | GBP | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Slovakia | EUR | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Slovenia | EUR | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Spain | EUR | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Sweden | SEK | On request | Up to 30% below list |
United Arab Emirates | AED | On request | Up to 30% below list |
United States | USD | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Wales | GBP | On request | Up to 30% below list |
Frequently asked questions
Does the quoted price include our sanctions and PEP watchlists?
No. Watchlist, PEP and adverse-media data are licensed from the data vendors and are frequently the largest line in a screening estate. The SymphonyAI figure covers the AI screening layer only. Ask for data, engine, module and implementation to be quoted separately, then apply Stackingo's discount of up to 30% below list, floor 10%, to the SymphonyAI lines.
Why does the Azure listing show zero for a three-year term?
Because it is a private-offer placeholder. The single plan publishes a starting price of 0.0 USD over a P3Y term with a pricing type of free, which lets Microsoft attach a privately negotiated offer to the listing. It is a transaction route, not a rate. The real number is quoted per institution and Stackingo takes up to 30% off it, with a contractual minimum of 10%.
Can this module run on a screening engine that is not NetReveal?
It is designed and sold as an overlay to SymphonyAI's own name and transaction screening, so assume the engine is part of the purchase unless SymphonyAI confirms otherwise in writing for your specific stack. Confirm it before you budget. Whichever configuration is agreed, Stackingo's position is up to 30% below SymphonyAI list, floored at 10%.
What should we demand in the quotation that vendors leave out?
A peak-throughput figure rather than an average, a stated list-refresh frequency, a written latency commitment on payment rails, model explainability included in the schedule, and the false-positive reduction expressed at a fixed recall on your own data. Those five turn a soft quote into a testable one. Stackingo's up-to-30% discount, minimum 10%, applies to whatever total that specification produces.
Is the licence counted per compliance analyst?
No. It is scoped to screening throughput and to the flows in scope, so hiring more analysts does not increase what you pay, and neither does reducing the team. Message volume, screening flows and term length are the variables that move the figure. The discount does not move with them: up to 30% below list, never below 10%.
How much is the discount worth over a three-year term?
On an annual list figure of Q, the ceiling of 30% costs 2.10Q across three years and the floor of 10% costs 2.70Q, against 3.00Q undiscounted. The gap between best and worst case is 0.60Q — over half a year of subscription — recovered without reducing coverage or lowering the recall threshold.
Which currencies can Stackingo invoice this licence in?
AED, SAR, QAR, GBP, EUR, SEK, AUD, NZD and USD, across the GCC, UK & Ireland, Europe, Oceania and the US, with the rate fixed at signature. Every list cell reads On request because SymphonyAI publishes no price in any currency, while the Stackingo position of up to 30% below list, floor 10%, is identical in all of them.
Related Stackingo pricing guides
Read alongside the other SymphonyAI financial-crime guides that share this commercial pattern: SymphonyAI NetReveal Name Screening Pricing, SymphonyAI SensaAI for AML Pricing, SymphonyAI SRI Investigation (formerly Sensa Investigation Hub) Pricing and SymphonyAI NetReveal Customer Due Diligence Pricing. The SymphonyAI SensaAI for Sanctions product page carries the capability detail, and a scoped quotation can be requested against your own screening throughput.
Send the throughput, not the headcount. Give Stackingo your peak screening volume, your flows in scope and the engine you run, and a scoped SymphonyAI SensaAI for Sanctions Pricing quotation comes back — genuine SymphonyAI licences, up to 30% below list with a 10% floor, and renewals managed for you — across the GCC, UK & Ireland, Europe, Oceania and the US.
